The Rainie Treatment
Wanderings & wonderings of a public school administrator
The Rainie Treatment
Navigation
  • About Me
  • Resources

Time to Teach

21 August 2019 | Filed under: Teaching and tagged with: block schedule, classroom management, learning, teaching, time on learning

Jennifer Gonzalez’s Cult of Pedagogy post on block scheduling is a quick dive into the block-scheduled classroom. She reviews what a block schedule refers to—1½ to 2 hour long classes, with fewer classes meeting each day—and finishes strong by quickly presenting five models for using the long block of time. It is a great way to consider some critique of the model and then start thinking about how to plan effective lessons within it.

Key to this post is Gonzalez’s speedy takedown of teacher-directed lecture, a “plank” argument fundamental to the Cult of Pedagogy ethos (and, candidly, central to why I’m drawn to her work).  She looks at a teacher’s letter to a newspaper in which he dismisses inquiry learning as little more than “babysitting,” complaining that he can’t cover enough content in his high school class because of the long block “play-time.” Gonzalez identifies the teacher’s base assumption that “teaching = lecture” (and concedes that lecture-based instruction would not work for 90 minutes in a high school class!). There is a familiar breakdown between the specialist who imparts knowledge—the “sage on the stage” who believes that his talking (or writing) is what earns him the title—and the coach who leads students to discover concepts—the “guide on the side.”

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiI5sStvpXkAhUPJt8KHVEADSAQjRx6BAgBEAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Ftucson.com%2Fnews%2Flocal%2Feducation%2Fprecollegiate%2Fhigh-school-graduation-in-half-the-time-possible-at-amphi%2Farticle_e34a6d60-577f-5952-bab6-b6145edf4e8b.html&psig=AOvVaw2KEhTGpRSs8t0ZqIUcS82q&ust=1566528980979623

Gonzalez glosses a bit over the telling indicator that supports this latter method, but it peeks through when she considers the two ways to lecture for 90 minutes:

“1.  Lecture for the full 90 minutes, which bores students to tears… So in this case, you’re ‘covering’ a lot of material, but students aren’t learning it.

 2.  Lecture for half the period, then give students the second half for ‘homework time.’ This is also ineffective because that means students are actually learning only half the material over the course of a semester or year.”

Did you catch that? In both models, Gonzalez’s central question is: What did the students learn? This is the difference between teacher-centered and student-centered learning. The former focuses on what the adult did:

  • Did you deliver the lecture/notes?
  • Did you provide access to the information?
  • Did you impart your expertise?

The latter looks at what the outcomes were for the child:

  • Did they learn the information?
  • Will they remember it on the test?
  • Will they be able to use this knowledge or skill down the road?

This begs the question, If the students didn’t learn something, can you really say that you have taught it?  To me, a teacher doesn’t earn their salary by showing up and talking (or writing); they earn it when their students learn the content.

(To be fair, this cursory assessment by me completely glosses over students’ responsibility to learn the material—by attending to the teaching, doing the work, studying. I also don’t mean to suggest that there is no place for teacher-directed instruction, or that anyone who lectures doesn’t teach kids; of course, this isn’t the case.)

https://torange.biz/it/fx/lesson-first-desk-very-vivid-colours-9193

Gonzalez rounds out the post by suggesting different methods to work through the material and break up the period. This would be different depending on the exact length of each period and what subject and grade level you’re teaching, but it provides a few basic models to start with.

Key takeaways:

Multiple activities will be planned for most days. Kids can’t sit still and do one thing over and over every day. The best way to harness the long block of time is to transition between activities.

  • Sometimes this will take the form of introducing something, digging into it more deeply, coming back to reteach/relearn, and practicing again. 
  • Other times, it will take the form of bouncing between different strands of the curriculum. 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/125892716@N05/14583659336

When switching between activities, I would also recommend structuring it so that there is an opportunity to move. Sitting in one spot, not all kids will make the shift between activities; get them up and moving to get their blood flowing.

  • Sometimes teachers worry that they will lose time “refocusing” the class.  The best approach to avoid this is to let the kids know in advance what’s about to happen, and then let them stand and move. When you announce that it’s time to settle back in, they will be more likely to know what’s expected of them (and you should repeat your expectations, too).
  • In a real pinch, you can also enlist the kids to your cause. Tell them exactly how much time they have to transition and why it’s important not to lose time: “We got caught up sharing our journal entries earlier, so I need to make up a little time here. We’re going to move these desks into small groups, but I really need to do it quickly so we can start the group work and not leave all this work for you to do on your own at home tonight.” Kids will join you, if you let them know why it matters to you—and even better, to them!
  • Another option is to only have some kids actually get up and move. Call on one group at a time to avoid pandemonium. Or, assign classroom jobs to the kids who need the most mobility breaks, and get them moving around the room more often. Call on a fidgety individual and ask her to bring you something: “Can you grab my stapler off the back table and bring it up to me, please? Thank you!” (No, I do not need to staple anything, but you can bet I’ll find some bundle of papers to quickly fasten!)

When I first started teaching, I fiercely resisted posting an agenda on my board. I feared I would lose some of the “element of surprise” that kept kids engaged as I shifted between activities, and that it would stifle my ability to respond to teachable moments in the classroom. Under direct order from my principal, I started posting a bare-bones agenda, and I quickly grew to love it. It kept me moving efficiently through the daily plan, and it kept the kids more often on board because they could see what was next. I could still adjust the plan as questions or discussions came up, and it made my thinking more overt to the students when I did so. The opportunity to tell them, “We’re going to move that activity to tomorrow because I really want to keep talking about this chapter” was immeasurably rewarding. It showed my students how important their learning was to me: I wanted to hear their questions, I wanted to share ideas, and I was always ready to make adjustments as long as they were working to learn.  I had 58-minute blocks when I started teaching, and I always appreciated having the time to teach.

Thanks to Tami Brass (@brasst) who retweeted this “oldie but goodie” blog post from Jennifer Gonzalez (@cultofpedagogy)! 

Gonzalez, Jennifer. “Making the Most of a 90-Minute Block.” Cult of Pedagogy weblog. 13 Aug 2017 (accessed 21 Aug 2019).

Images:

(1.) https://tucson.com/news/local/education/precollegiate/high-school-graduation-in-half-the-time-possible-at-amphi/article_e34a6d60-577f-5952-bab6-b6145edf4e8b.html

(2.) https://torange.biz/it/fx/lesson-first-desk-very-vivid-colours-9193

(3.) https://www.flickr.com/photos/125892716@N05/14583659336 via https://www.amenclinics.com/

Related

Share

Did you like this article? Share it with your friends!

Tweet

Written by Damon Rainie

Follow me on Twitter

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Find posts by topic

administrator anti-racist assessment Books Read bullying change change agent classroom management client conduct conversation coronavirus counseling COVID19 customer service discipline education educator equity etiquette idea innovation leadership learning management parent parenting presentation professionalism public service quarantine questioning racism respect right to education school social contract socialization society stakeholder teacher teaching team teaching What Im Reading white privilege

Find posts by category

Search the archives

  • September 2020 (1)
  • August 2020 (2)
  • July 2020 (5)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • May 2020 (2)
  • August 2019 (3)
  • March 2015 (1)
  • November 2014 (1)
  • April 2014 (3)
  • March 2014 (6)

Recent Posts

  • “Both/And” thinking and Race – #WhatImReading
  • What I’m Reading: “Children and COVID-19: State Data Report”
  • What I’m Reading: “So You Want to Talk About Race” chapter 1
  • What do we need from schools in September?
  • What I’m Reading: “Rich Dad, Poor Dad” by Robert Kiyosaki

Recent Comments

  • “Both/And” thinking and Race – #WhatImReading – The Rainie Treatment on What I’m Reading: Some Students Should Go To School, Most Should Stay Home
  • What I’m Reading: “So You Want to Talk About Race?” chapter 1 – The Rainie Treatment on What I’m Reading: “So You Want To Talk About Race” by Ijeoma Oluo
  • Shepard Rainie on What do we need from schools in September?
  • Diane on What do we need from schools in September?
  • Lisa Goldman on What do we need from schools in September?

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, Rainie Treatment by Damon Rainie is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2023 The Rainie Treatment

Powered by Esplanade Theme and WordPress

 

Loading Comments...